Here's a source I found for the UK at least:
Together we can change the rules to protect the planet, share the wealth and give everyone a say in how the economy is run.
New Economics Foundation (neweconomics.org)
There’s no federal law in the US that requires them to give you a lunch break. My state doesn’t have one either.
In California, you can only waive it if you work less than 6 hours. Otherwise, you need to take a lunch before the 5th hour hits. For overtime, you get a second (you can waive, they cant) meal period after your 10th hour.
If I recal, there are federal laws in the US that require breaks, just not specifically for lunch?
Where I live it counts as work time (and you get paid for it) if you can't leave the workplace during it. I can leave so it doesn't count as paid work time, but it's still at a set time for convenience.
And ofc because law demands break every so often
I’m a salaried software developer. My first job was 8-5 with a lunch break that we had to take. I asked if I could take it at the start or the end of the day and was told, “No.” So my coworkers and I started playing board games 3-4 times a week during our lunch break in one of the offices. Mainly legacy games like Gloomhaven and Pandemic Legacy. The VP loved showing off the board game room to the interviewees to show that we like to have fun there.
I do miss that job sometimes because it was just raw programming. I was programming or writing SQL queries for over 30 hours a week. No AppSec, no lengthy review process, no bullshit (except the pay, which was ok for Mississippi).
I have a hard time seeing that happening at my workplace, but I see how it can be significant for jobs like medical staff, security, etc.
Good for you then! I work in IT with time critical trading systems, so lunch is sometimes interrupted so we can fix the issues. Bit annoying, but that's part of the deal.
I also work in IT, but tbf that sounds a lot more exciting than the projects I work on.
Nope! The only laws that really apply to those are which breaks are paid and which are not. If you are given any breaks, 20 minutes or less must be paid and count towards OT. Anything over can be off the clock.
Breaks are unpaid because that was another way to minimize what workers have to be paid.
Businesses always look for ways to pay their employees less and only change practices when forced.
Without strong unions and support from politicians things tend to get worse and worse.
Too bad that we have neither.
Yeah thats my job. If you have an incident and we check your vehicle logs and you arent taking your breaks its an automatic write up. Because nationally its been proven that drivers who DO take their breaks have less incidents.
America is not the norm, dude.
With or without, that right is still due to Union actions my friend
Again, check local laws, but in general you can be fired for cause (meaning no unemployment insurance eligibility) for violating company policy. So "legally" might be wrong but "had to clock out (if you want to keep working here)" might be accurate.
the boss makes a dollar,
I make a dime.
that's why I shit on company time.
Seriously though, I really hate that managers hate employees leaving early. Just how controlling do you want to be? Employees are not kids.
In "at will" states in the US, you can be fired without cause and without notice. So do your homework before you decide not to follow company policy.
I've always been in an "at will" state (Arkansas) and my more recent firing was without cause and without notice. But, since it wasn't for cause, I was/am eligible for unemployment insurance.
I'm not claiming, because I can't actually accept any job offer, due to the constraints of familial duties, and Arkansas requires you accept an offer when you on UI. (I think there are conditions where you can reject, but I've not read the statues, just the guidelines published by the relevant Arkansas government department, which aren't that explicit.)
It's about power.
