What about capitalist lite️?

Congratulation! You have high-roaded the environment into the dumpster! You are complicit in all the actions of the election winners, because you helped put them in office!

May all your moralizing keep you warm at night.

Cool story bud but that's not how shit works. Go play your reactionary, blame-shifting games elsewhere.

Edit: lol please keep responding you braindead Muppets, it lets me know who to block.

We can have a little exploitation and suffering as a treat.

I voted for the least capitalist party, but the most capitalist party won. Now the landlords are getting tax rebates and public services are running further into the ground.

A big chunk of apathetic people didn't vote at all. By the time I retire (whatever that means) everything will be privatised.

Climate change please hurry up.

Our friends husband teld her he voted Trump.

It was one big nail in the coffin of that marriage.

So, I'm not assuming that you or the person I replied to are in the US specifically.

But in the context of the US, if you (generally) chose not to vote in the 2024 election then you are guilty of doing nothing to prevent the atrocities committed by the Trump administration, when you in fact had the opportunity to do something - which is to say that you are guilty of negligence.

If you encouraged others to not vote then you are complicit in the actions of the Trump administration, because you helped put them in power.

There is no "blame-shifting game" being played here, as there is no need to shift anything. The blame is direct, valid, and undeniable.

The fact that it's only a little is the treat

Climate change please hurry up.

Don't want to get your own hands dirty actually making a change?

Oh yeah like a little bit of cancer. How lucky.

Anyone who voted for trump deserves to get divorced. The lack of morals, the lack of basic human empathy is present in all trump voters.

Maybe if everyone votes for the least capitalist party every time....

It's not blame shifting. The blame sits directly on you, personally, and already had been.
No need to shift it at all.

Uh, yeah, exactly? A little bit of cancer can be fought and beaten. A lot of cancer is a death sentence.

Depends where the cancer is doesn't it now?

Not really, no. Less cancer is always better than more cancer, no matter where it is.

You do know that everyone has a bit of cancer, right? Zero cancer just isn't a thing that happens in an organism composed of trillions of cells. Likewise, zero exploitation and suffering just isn't a thing that happens in a population composed of billions of people.

A little cancer is handled by immune reaction, a little more by medicine and surgery, a lot kills the organism. A little exploitation is handled by social reaction, a little more by political action, a lot kills the population.

No matter where the cancer is, less is better than more. We were in the treatable stage and you clowns insisted on skipping chemo.

No cancer is better, less cancer is not better - it's still cancer. But if you're willing to accept that, go for it; Enjoy your cancer.

And why are you comparing it with a 'harmless' amount of cancer that is naturally removed and not an issue instead of what any normal person thinks of when they hear cancer?

How does that work with electors anyway? I'm under the impression that if you don't live in a swing state your vote is basically a formality.

Zero cancer just isn't a thing that happens in an organism composed of trillions of cells. Likewise, zero exploitation and suffering just isn't a thing that happens in a population composed of billions of people.

No cancer isn't a thing. It's only "better" in an unobtainable, hypothetical, entirely delusional sense. Refusing to settle for less than impossible things is just plain stupid. We were managing with less societal cancer. You skipped chemo because it makes you feel yucky, and now it's metastasized. Are you proud of yourself?

Or, and please hear me out, because you're not going to like it.

The Republican party are directly responsible for putting Trump as the nominee.

The people who voted Republican are directly responsible.

The Democrat party are indirectly responsible by presenting such a poor-looking alternative. "We're not Trump" is not enough.

The people who chose not to vote are the least responsible of all.

You're directing your anger in the wrong direction. It's the corruption within the system you need to be tearing down, not some poor sod on the internet.

What's the plan - to scare them into voting the way you want in the next election? To argue with and win over the millions of extra voters the Democrats needed?

The problem isn't with the people who saw that both sides were bad options - it's with the Democrat party for being a bad option.