ekk
  • K
    1
    0

    ^^ This is my take. Behave like an adult.

    99% of the time, I don't have anywhere to be in a hurry, so I let others (who may or may not need to) go first.

    I often travel with kids at this time in my life, but we just chill in our row until things get calm. Then we can grab stuff from overhead if needed, even if it's behind us.

    On the occasions where I've needed to rush to make a connecting flight, I just say it out loud and get some buy-in from those around me, or it's already obvious and the whole cabin is probably aware. In those cases, getting non-pressured people to give you priority tends to work if you just ask.

    I can imagine a class of passenger who is super dependent on timing -- but those people have already failed. PSA: When traveling, assume that you will not depart or arrive at the exact time on your ticket. Give yourself an hour or two to absorb delays and then you can just be chill.

  • T
    3
    0

    The problem is underallocated overhead space. You give us maximum dimensions, and you know the number of seats. Fucking have sufficient overhead space.

  • R
    6
    0

    They really need to load back to front, then unload front to back, if it was organized it would go so much better. Like announce when each group can stand and get bags and when each can leave.

  • Z
    13
    0

    Waiting in line to purchase something is entirely different from exiting a plane and I'm disappointed that I have to point that out to you.

  • P
    18
    0

    Ah yes, the most human deboarding method. Children deboarding on their own. Families separated.

    Hundreds of people trying to reunite at the gate all simultaneously.

    That won't cause any downstream issues.

  • R
    1
    0

    I just don't (entirely) agree about vacation families. Just like the airlines made their bad with paid checked luggage causing more cabin luggage, they did the same with paid seating. Most families wouldn't care where they sit - so long as they're together.

    I male sure we always sit together, but for some, additional 200-500 USD/EUR for the whole trip is significant and may account for a good portion of the holiday budget.

    Now one may say that then they shouldn't fly, but why? Again - airlines made this problem.

  • canajac@lemmy.caC
    1
    0

    I've never flown but want to but all this crap news about airlines and people not understanding basic saftey issues is nerve racking.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.worksE
    54
    0

    IMHO there should be a child section in back.

  • C
    1
    0

    But how can they sell priority boarding then? Just think for one minute about the poor airline companies! /s

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.worksE
    54
    0

    If they're rude enough to cut, then they might be rude enough to "accidentally" bash past your leg.

  • Z
    17
    0

    There's an effect I see in situations like this where the people in a big hurried rush end up being slow asses because apparently they don't care about this working efficiently, they just care about when they can stop waiting.

    On a plane these are the people who leap out of their seat and block your row, only to start searching for their bag once it's their turn to get off the plane.

    I see the same from drivers at red lights. If there are multiple lanes waiting to go, and one car has to inch forward every 5 seconds even though they are already way past the line, then in my very limited anecdotal experience there's like a 90% chance when the light turns green they just sit there for a few seconds after I start going.

  • sethtaylor@lemmy.worldS
    7
    0

    Airlines: "Wait, but I thought if you unload front to back you get a UTI"

  • I
    13
    0

    Let all 200 of you live a separate life for a year and you would all start killing one another as soon as you boarded the plane. By the time the plane landed all of 'you' would all have to be carried off.

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzB
    56
    0

    one car has to inch forward every 5 seconds even though they are already way past the line

    In my limited experience these cars are driven by people so absorbed by their phones that they don’t realize they aren’t fully engaging the brakes.

  • S
    17
    0

    And me. I'd just wait the 30 seconds for all of yous to deboard and then take my sweet time.

  • C
    3
    0

    Me and my 300 clones spider-crawling over the seats to deplane.

  • B
    1
    0

    This ignores:

    1. People with only a carry on.
    2. People with tight connecting flights they need to get to.
  • T
    17
    0

    The amount of space is the amount of space. You can't create more, because it's literally constrained by the roof of the plane. It's already maxed out.

    The only thing they could do to make sure there was "enough space" is to have less tightly packrd seats and carry less people, which again they aren't going to do for the obvious reason - profit.

    Or - reduce the max carry on baggage dimensions, which I'm sure people would equally complain about. And would make them look worse against other airlines which "allow" bigger bags, despite there not being enough space to put them!

  • A
    12
    0

    I think automatic transmissions have conditioned people to sit too far from the pedals.

    I just bought an old classic and haven't driven stick in a decade. After I got everything comfy and adjusted how I wanted I realized something: I couldn't get the clutch all the way down if I tried, I'm too far away. Same for the brakes.

    Power brakes have made us feel as though all we need is the braking power of our toes, but what happens when your ABS pump goes out and you have to use actual force to apply the brakes at 65mph? Do you have the leverage to get those brakes as far down as they need to to stop safely?

    If we were all still popping clutches at every red light I don't think this would be an issue. I think we'd have less distracted drivers too, needing to shift manually keeps a driver engaged with the car and road.

    I Wasn't advocating to ban Automatic Transmissions when this comment started, I am now.

  • flamekebab@piefed.socialF
    16
    0

    It stands, but it neither contradicts nor supports my line of thinking. I was aware of it already when I wondered about adults constantly being in a rush. You can restate it if you like but it doesn't change my curiosity at the nature of this common problem.

    My comment is more about what the underlying cause of the pervasiveness of this issue. Were people always like this or is it one of these fun results of industrialisation? Is it a western culture thing? Is it a capitalism thing? Rhetorical questions in this case - I'm not seeking specific answers from anyone today. I am interested but it feels like we'll end up arguing and I could do without that.

    I'd be curious how different cultures handle rush, timekeeping, social pressure related to commitments. Needing to rush constantly seems like a bit of either a systemic failure or a deliberate dark pattern.