Or save them redundantly to several archive-quality hdds. Why have 20 blu-ray dvds for one copy of a collection when you could have 3 complete copies on 3 hdd. Both are life limited media, both will eventually require re-archiving. One has potential for mechanical failure, the other more likely to physically degrade. Pick your poison, or do one of each.

Yeah, but that's not some massive conspiracy to remove them. They just don't sell, like CDs before them. Blu-ray never really won its format war. It just staved off the execution of discs for a few years.

£25 for one movie is a hard sell when it will come to Disney+ in a month. Even more so when it can get you a VPN for 6 months and you can have it now.

The extended DVD for 40 Year Old Virgin features all the "how I know you're gay" that didn't make the movie itself. I giggled extensively.

Probably the same software tbh. Handbrake. Whatever you choose, it's nearly all ffmpeg under the hood.

Downloading might still be better, depending if you're in the subtitles gang or not. Disc subtitles are ugly af, and might not play without transcoding on some devices.

What's wrong with Curiosity?

Does it require a subscription? If it does they will make it worse and worse as they try to squeeze out every last penny they can from it. Maybe not today or tomorrow but eventually. Or they'll close shop and you'll have nothing to show for it. Unless they let you download videos that are drm free . Which I doubt

Host? Sounds like a problem I'm too "several large HDDs" to understand.

Check out the makemkv forums on drive advice. The gui makemkv should work as well, not so much anything relying on the command line tools (arm ripper, etc).

Handbrake is encoding software that works pretty well and can encode straight from disc.

VLC can also do it.

I have personally started dd'ing to iso then encoding the main feature from that for my server, and saving the iso separately just in case I really want to play those dumb dvd extra features and fbi warnings.

Ripping can be a pain, there's all kinds of encryption hoops to jump through, and I have come across a few dvds that I just couldn't rip no matter what I tried.

Wait, did they mess with lilo and stitch?

Anybody who has seen Tropic Thunder.

its a figure of speech, but that's not important right now.

Local Libraries allows us to lend media in a social way, and just like the Internet Archive are an important pillar to our society. But thats not how Media Companies see it that way and compares the Internet Archive with Piracy.

Torrenting is fine and dandy though, so is Soulseeking.

I've never cared about visual quality myself. I regularly play atari 2600 games so graphics are no where in my realm of care

I guess that's the point I'm trying to make. Not giving the name of the movie means either the comment wasn't for you (because you already know it), or that it doesn't actually help you.

Not the publishers fault, for the vast majority it's by choice and not necessity that they don't buy physical media anymore.

VHS? No thanks!

No, I ain't going back to VHS. The quality was horrible. I don't want to fiddle the with tracking.

The best thing about it was that you could easily record what was on the TV.

No you can still watch it, it hasn't been altered or removed...but they have also made a live action lilo & stitch, but watching it is optional so who the fuck cares.

People got lazy and threw away their stuff thinking streaming was the future. Some of us knew better because we know how capitalism works.

Own your media folks!

Digital Video Download

a fair and subjective opinion