@thelinuxEXP As a former GIMP team member, all I can say is that the only project that attempted to fix the problematic name (Glimpse) failed at its one job. After so many claims that a good name would attract tons of developers, the fork couldn't even get a committed maintainer who would reapply a rebranding patchset. Meanwhile, a single GIMP contributor lately has a soft fork named "Artbox" and seems to have no problem maintaining the rebranding. How can one possibly fathom this? 
Posts
-
To be clear: Iām not saying the GIMP name is awesome and should be kept at all costs.