Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
ekk

ekk

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Comic Strips
  4. Voting

Voting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Comic Strips
comicstrips
170 Posts 62 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C [email protected]

    Always astonishing to me that I am either being cut lightly a thousand times or fucking gutted by a fish, and I'm angry about all of it and you all seem to think the mature answer is to be grateful for the light cutting cause it's "better" by comparison.

    "A person can be smart, but people are stupid."

    Most people are complete utter fucking morons about this. Enjoy voting for slower death and somehow finding a smugness in it.

    starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
    starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #155

    Don't complain. You said the options were 100% carnage, or 75% carnage, and because there's no 0% carnage option, you're happy letting 100% win. What people are trying to explain to you is that you should reduce harm as much as possible, even if you can't reduce it entirely.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C [email protected]

      Are you implying I should give a shit about something here? Cause I really don't. Try harder with an actual argument rather than an idiot popularity vote.

      callyral@pawb.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      callyral@pawb.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #156

      no i was just being unfunny and pointing out how at the moment i took the screenshot, the upvote-downvote counters were literally 1984

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C [email protected]

        My vote in the last election LITERALLY WOULD NOT HAVE CHANGED A GOD DAMNED THING.

        Get the fuck over yourself and just let your high horse fuck you in the ass. Take your idealism elsewhere. Fucking exhausting.

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #157

        Defeatist prick

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D [email protected]
          This post did not contain any content.
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #158

          Was it me? I bet it was me. That's okay, though. I probably wouldn't vote for me either.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C [email protected]

            Mate, using your logic "black" isn't a race. This is also technically true, but not really how the term "race" is used. Taking your logic and applying it to this term that is widely accepted caloquially as a race, you end up being able to say that it's "impossible to be racist against black people" which would be seen as a racist remark.

            antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
            antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #159

            nah that's not my logic you're just a fucking moron

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K [email protected]

              white isn’t a race it’s the social construct that means the absence of race

              All "races" are social constructs, there are no biological races for our species and the way we define social races isn't even uniform across different cultures.

              means the absence of race

              And that is actually a profoundly racist statement that roots many portions of white supremacist ideology.

              why it’s literally impossible to be racist against white people

              While it's quite easy to argue that white people are in no danger of becoming ethnically prosecuted in most of western society, your statement that it's impossible to be racist against white people is got a built in logic contradiction and is therefore invalid by nature. Even without the contradiction, all it takes to take down a blanket statement like that is finding a counter-example, and that's so trivial I could find historical examples in less than five minutes.

              antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
              antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #160

              And that is actually a profoundly racist statement

              okay crakkker

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA [email protected]

                nah that's not my logic you're just a fucking moron

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #161

                Explain how it isn't? Typically once someone resorts to name calling in a discussion it's a good sign they know they're in the wrong.

                antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • C [email protected]

                  Explain how it isn't? Typically once someone resorts to name calling in a discussion it's a good sign they know they're in the wrong.

                  antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
                  antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by [email protected]
                  #162

                  fuck you

                  you explain how the shit you decided to write is my logic

                  fucking asshole pompous piece of shit hypocrite

                  self oblivious dumb motherfucker

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P [email protected]

                    I'm not the one confused, I understood Sahara just fine. I'm more confused why we're 10 comments deep into, essentially, Sahara's choice to use the word "never."

                    I'm asking this seriously: how do you handle sarcasm? Or hyperbole?

                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by [email protected]
                    #163

                    Depends on how tactfully they're used. I'm amazed a basic lesson on phrasing and tact is so far out of your league. This entire conversation is pathetic. For you.

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M [email protected]

                      Depends on how tactfully they're used. I'm amazed a basic lesson on phrasing and tact is so far out of your league. This entire conversation is pathetic. For you.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #164

                      Okay, so the word "never" is being used here in its hyperbolic form to, tactfully, strengthen the rhetoric. It impassions the speech to deliver a point with more verve than another choice would.

                      The message is easy to receive. What is it you gain by being this needlessly contrarian?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA [email protected]

                        fuck you

                        you explain how the shit you decided to write is my logic

                        fucking asshole pompous piece of shit hypocrite

                        self oblivious dumb motherfucker

                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by [email protected]
                        #165

                        Fine, I'll indulge you.

                        white isn't a race it's the social construct

                        This is both true and false. By all accepted definitions of race that I could find, white counts as a race. However, race as a concept is a social construct. Some folks back in the day decided to categorize people by things they have in common. (e.g. physical attributes, geographic location, genetics) However, this doesn't have any basis in science due to there being more genetic variation within the defined races than between them. Most biologists and anthropologists don't accept race as a scientifically valid biological classification.

                        that means the absence of race

                        This is false by all definitions of race. Race is just a collection of people sharing similar attributes, so the "white" race absolutely counts, considering all "white" people share a similar characteristic: skin color.

                        Irish stopped being a race when they were accepted into whiteness by becoming police in large number

                        This one threw me for a loop, as I'm not really sure what you mean by this. Irish is 100% still a race, as they are a group of people that can be defined by geographic location. There are groups that don't think they belong in the greater "white" race due to some historical beefs, but at the end of the day, most definitions of the "white" race include Irish folks, as they have white skin.

                        That's why it's literally impossible to be racist against white people

                        This part doesn't make sense. By the most common definitions of racist, it's possible to be racist against any given race. Some definitions of racist that I read in school did change that by adding a clause for racism being prejudice towards a marginalized group. In that case, it wouldn't be possible to be racist towards the greater "white" race, as they have never historically been marginalised. However, this definition of racist hasn't been widely accepted, as it almost exists to prevent being able to say racism towards the "white" race exists.

                        If you think that it's impossible to be racist towards a race that is all-encompassing like the "white" race, then, unless you're using a different definition of racist, then if would be equally impossible to be racist towards the all-encompassing "black" race.

                        No need to lash out just because people are calling you out for your misunderstanding of your own words. Given how your sentences are written, English might not be your first language, so there's a good chance that this misunderstanding comes from a translation or language barrier. Hopefully I have cleared things up!

                        antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • C [email protected]

                          Fine, I'll indulge you.

                          white isn't a race it's the social construct

                          This is both true and false. By all accepted definitions of race that I could find, white counts as a race. However, race as a concept is a social construct. Some folks back in the day decided to categorize people by things they have in common. (e.g. physical attributes, geographic location, genetics) However, this doesn't have any basis in science due to there being more genetic variation within the defined races than between them. Most biologists and anthropologists don't accept race as a scientifically valid biological classification.

                          that means the absence of race

                          This is false by all definitions of race. Race is just a collection of people sharing similar attributes, so the "white" race absolutely counts, considering all "white" people share a similar characteristic: skin color.

                          Irish stopped being a race when they were accepted into whiteness by becoming police in large number

                          This one threw me for a loop, as I'm not really sure what you mean by this. Irish is 100% still a race, as they are a group of people that can be defined by geographic location. There are groups that don't think they belong in the greater "white" race due to some historical beefs, but at the end of the day, most definitions of the "white" race include Irish folks, as they have white skin.

                          That's why it's literally impossible to be racist against white people

                          This part doesn't make sense. By the most common definitions of racist, it's possible to be racist against any given race. Some definitions of racist that I read in school did change that by adding a clause for racism being prejudice towards a marginalized group. In that case, it wouldn't be possible to be racist towards the greater "white" race, as they have never historically been marginalised. However, this definition of racist hasn't been widely accepted, as it almost exists to prevent being able to say racism towards the "white" race exists.

                          If you think that it's impossible to be racist towards a race that is all-encompassing like the "white" race, then, unless you're using a different definition of racist, then if would be equally impossible to be racist towards the all-encompassing "black" race.

                          No need to lash out just because people are calling you out for your misunderstanding of your own words. Given how your sentences are written, English might not be your first language, so there's a good chance that this misunderstanding comes from a translation or language barrier. Hopefully I have cleared things up!

                          antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
                          antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by [email protected]
                          #166

                          This is both true and false. By all accepted definitions of race that I could find, white counts as a race.

                          "NU UH!!!"

                          Wow what an academic

                          Never seen someone just bullshit before while using quotation formatting. You're putting on a clinic of being a slimy dishonest asshole

                          Race is just a collection of people sharing similar attributes

                          Oh! Okay! So once you deliberately strip race of all cultural and material context white can be declared a race 'because they look the same'

                          Well if you're willing to just compartmentalize literally everything until your premise is affirmed then you can tell yourself anything, can't you?

                          You've chosen a definition of race that's completely useless for everything except one task: to be able to claim victimhood for the privileged class

                          Irish stopped being a race when they were accepted into whiteness by becoming police in large number This one threw me for a loop, as I’m not really sure what you mean by this.

                          HOW FUCKING STUPID DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO LECTURE SOMEONE WHEN YOU OPENLY ADMIT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON

                          REALLY FUCKING STUPID

                          Bet you're white. "My feelings are more important than your facts and I'm elevated from you enough to speak without even knowing them" is extremely white coded

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA [email protected]

                            This is both true and false. By all accepted definitions of race that I could find, white counts as a race.

                            "NU UH!!!"

                            Wow what an academic

                            Never seen someone just bullshit before while using quotation formatting. You're putting on a clinic of being a slimy dishonest asshole

                            Race is just a collection of people sharing similar attributes

                            Oh! Okay! So once you deliberately strip race of all cultural and material context white can be declared a race 'because they look the same'

                            Well if you're willing to just compartmentalize literally everything until your premise is affirmed then you can tell yourself anything, can't you?

                            You've chosen a definition of race that's completely useless for everything except one task: to be able to claim victimhood for the privileged class

                            Irish stopped being a race when they were accepted into whiteness by becoming police in large number This one threw me for a loop, as I’m not really sure what you mean by this.

                            HOW FUCKING STUPID DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO LECTURE SOMEONE WHEN YOU OPENLY ADMIT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON

                            REALLY FUCKING STUPID

                            Bet you're white. "My feelings are more important than your facts and I'm elevated from you enough to speak without even knowing them" is extremely white coded

                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            C This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by [email protected]
                            #167

                            "NU UH!!!"
                            Never seen someone just bullshit before while using quotation formatting. You're putting on a clinic of being a slimy dishonest asshole

                            Please, point out where I'm making stuff up. With zero efforr responses like these, I'm not sure why I'm even bothering to respond to you. If you think I'm lying about the definition of race, here are all the human-relevant definitions of race in several dictionaries, almost all would suggest how I'm using race is the most common:

                            Race as defined by The American Heritage Dictionary

                            1. A group of people identified as distinct from other groups because of supposed physical or genetic traits shared by the group. Most biologists and anthropologists do not recognize race as a biologically valid classification, in part because there is more genetic variation within groups than between them.
                              2.A group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographic distribution.
                            2. A genealogical line; a lineage.
                            3. Humans considered as a group.
                            4. A usually geographically isolated population of organisms that differs from other populations of the same species in certain heritable traits.

                            Race as defined by Marriam Webster dictionary

                            1. any one of the groups that humans are often divided into based on physical traits regarded as common among people of shared ancestry
                            2. a group of people sharing a common cultural, geographical, linguistic, or religious origin or background
                            3. the descendants of a common ancestor : a group sharing a common lineage

                            Oh! Okay! So once you deliberately strip race of all cultural and material context white can be declared a race 'because they look the same'

                            I didn't strip my race definition of anything. I'm using the definitions above. Me using the "look the same" example was to help solidify that race is a social construct, not that white was a race.

                            Well if you're willing to just compartmentalize literally everything until your premise is affirmed then you can tell yourself anything, can't you?

                            I'm not compartmentalizing anything. I'm using the dictionary definition of race. If you mean something else when you say race, then please, tell me your definition.

                            You've chosen a definition of race that's completely useless for everything except one task: to be able to claim victimhood for the privileged class

                            I've used a definition of race that fits 4 of the 7 dictionary definitions that I've seen. Yes, I guess I'm not using the ones regarding ancestry and genealogy, but those just segment what a race is further. Under those definitions, "black" isn't a race.

                            HOW FUCKING STUPID DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO LECTURE SOMEONE WHEN YOU OPENLY ADMIT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON

                            I understand the historical event you are referencing, and I understand that, in some places in the world, Irish immigrants weren't part of the "true white" race until they became racist towards folks without white skin and became police. What I don't understand is what that has to do with anything we're talking about. That doesn't make "white" any less of a race, that just means that white people in the past were extra racist, being racist against people from a different geological location, not just being racist by the color of their skin.

                            Bet you're white. "My feelings are more important than your facts and I'm elevated from you enough to speak without even knowing them" is extremely white coded

                            Please, point out where I am using feelings and you are using facts. Please, point out anything I've said that is not truthful. That's how arguements are done, and that's what I've been doing to everything you've said from the beginning. From my end, you have yet to have an argument that is more than "YOU'RE STUPID" without addressing a single thing I'm saying.

                            antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • C [email protected]

                              "NU UH!!!"
                              Never seen someone just bullshit before while using quotation formatting. You're putting on a clinic of being a slimy dishonest asshole

                              Please, point out where I'm making stuff up. With zero efforr responses like these, I'm not sure why I'm even bothering to respond to you. If you think I'm lying about the definition of race, here are all the human-relevant definitions of race in several dictionaries, almost all would suggest how I'm using race is the most common:

                              Race as defined by The American Heritage Dictionary

                              1. A group of people identified as distinct from other groups because of supposed physical or genetic traits shared by the group. Most biologists and anthropologists do not recognize race as a biologically valid classification, in part because there is more genetic variation within groups than between them.
                                2.A group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographic distribution.
                              2. A genealogical line; a lineage.
                              3. Humans considered as a group.
                              4. A usually geographically isolated population of organisms that differs from other populations of the same species in certain heritable traits.

                              Race as defined by Marriam Webster dictionary

                              1. any one of the groups that humans are often divided into based on physical traits regarded as common among people of shared ancestry
                              2. a group of people sharing a common cultural, geographical, linguistic, or religious origin or background
                              3. the descendants of a common ancestor : a group sharing a common lineage

                              Oh! Okay! So once you deliberately strip race of all cultural and material context white can be declared a race 'because they look the same'

                              I didn't strip my race definition of anything. I'm using the definitions above. Me using the "look the same" example was to help solidify that race is a social construct, not that white was a race.

                              Well if you're willing to just compartmentalize literally everything until your premise is affirmed then you can tell yourself anything, can't you?

                              I'm not compartmentalizing anything. I'm using the dictionary definition of race. If you mean something else when you say race, then please, tell me your definition.

                              You've chosen a definition of race that's completely useless for everything except one task: to be able to claim victimhood for the privileged class

                              I've used a definition of race that fits 4 of the 7 dictionary definitions that I've seen. Yes, I guess I'm not using the ones regarding ancestry and genealogy, but those just segment what a race is further. Under those definitions, "black" isn't a race.

                              HOW FUCKING STUPID DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO LECTURE SOMEONE WHEN YOU OPENLY ADMIT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON

                              I understand the historical event you are referencing, and I understand that, in some places in the world, Irish immigrants weren't part of the "true white" race until they became racist towards folks without white skin and became police. What I don't understand is what that has to do with anything we're talking about. That doesn't make "white" any less of a race, that just means that white people in the past were extra racist, being racist against people from a different geological location, not just being racist by the color of their skin.

                              Bet you're white. "My feelings are more important than your facts and I'm elevated from you enough to speak without even knowing them" is extremely white coded

                              Please, point out where I am using feelings and you are using facts. Please, point out anything I've said that is not truthful. That's how arguements are done, and that's what I've been doing to everything you've said from the beginning. From my end, you have yet to have an argument that is more than "YOU'RE STUPID" without addressing a single thing I'm saying.

                              antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
                              antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #168

                              Why the fuck would anything you're saying be meaningful or productive in an argument about something I said?

                              You know what? I give up.

                              I understand the historical event you are referencing, and I understand that, in some places in the world, Irish immigrants weren’t part of the “true white” race until they became racist towards folks without white skin and became police. What I don’t understand is what that has to do with anything we’re talking about. That doesn’t make “white” any less of a race, that just means that white people in the past were extra racist, being racist against people from a different geological location, not just being racist by the color of their skin.

                              Just being obstinate.

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA [email protected]

                                Why the fuck would anything you're saying be meaningful or productive in an argument about something I said?

                                You know what? I give up.

                                I understand the historical event you are referencing, and I understand that, in some places in the world, Irish immigrants weren’t part of the “true white” race until they became racist towards folks without white skin and became police. What I don’t understand is what that has to do with anything we’re talking about. That doesn’t make “white” any less of a race, that just means that white people in the past were extra racist, being racist against people from a different geological location, not just being racist by the color of their skin.

                                Just being obstinate.

                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by [email protected]
                                #169

                                Yeah, that's what I thought. Unless you've got something meaningful to add, I'm calling it here. You argue with 100% emotion, never adding anything meaningful to a conversation. Glad you can admit that you're just being obstinate

                                antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • C [email protected]

                                  Yeah, that's what I thought. Unless you've got something meaningful to add, I'm calling it here. You argue with 100% emotion, never adding anything meaningful to a conversation. Glad you can admit that you're just being obstinate

                                  antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  antioutsideaktion@lemmy.mlA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #170

                                  Fuck off you fucking 'no u' child

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups