Only when accompanied by "paperless" or "closed source"

This is true. Whoever decides the questions and determines the correct answer holds a lot of power.

Candidates being all garbage is exactly what you'd expect when they're just pawns for the people actually running the government (i.e. owners of big corporations).

Since they're shit, they're not popular and can't achieve much on their own. When they're not useful anymore they can be blamed and replaced by the next puppet.

Of course they're also shit, exactly because they're in the pocket of the very wealthy. In the US it seems even impossible to gain any significant position without their blessing.

Nope. It'll never work. Because when I walk into the voting booth, how do I KNOW FOR A VERIFIABLE FACT that this machine here in the booth with me is running the published software?

Computerized voting will always be a mistake.

You don't get to vote but also you might need to see a doctor. I think you might have ingested way too much colloidal silver. Like this guy

Hahaha both sides, am I right. Ahahahahh

Shut the he fuck up and actually vote in primaries and we will have better candidates.

Yes they should. But at the same time completely ignorant people should not. This is too big of a decision to leave up to disinterested and ill informed voters. I don't care if you are left or right. blue or red.

If you don't know the basics of how our government works you do not deserve to have a say. If you do not know the basics of what is happening in the country, then you do not deserve to vote.

ANYONE voting should be informed.

How we test for this? i have no idea. There can not be a simple education requirement or literacy test. There are plenty of uneducated people that are very up to date and informed on current politics. There are plenty of very educated people that don't care about what's going on and just vote by party.

But just because you have the right to an opinion does not mean your ignorant opinion is worth anything.

Still trying to figure out what happened in the second frame.

I vote in all the primaries you shut the fuck up you don't know who you are talking to dude

The options in the primaries usually suck too or the people in power push out the ones the people actually like.

Oh for sure, there are a lot of different areas in education that need to be changed. We need to go back to teaching people how to think rather than prepping them to just memorize for the test. That’s not even mentioning the issue that AI can have on the learning processes.

Good point, maybe the idea works better in theory than practice. Haha

Ahahahahaa xD

I'm glad it was a misunderstanding.

I think my central point still holds, so I'll develop on it a bit more.
Every era has its challenges, and they're all seemingly insurmountable and possibly the worst thing yet. They're less significant from our perspective, but we have the benefit of history. We know how the story progressed.
FDR did have nuclear war looming, they just only knew that meant "bad", but not the details. It was probably scarier then. We know now that he actually didn't because the German program was doomed to failure from the start, but they didn't at the time. They had an economy that was in tatters, a massive food shortage resulting in poorly quantified starvation, the most powerful militaries on the planet conquering Europe and Asia, and so on.
We're past the age where the president is likely to be able to inspire unity of purpose like they did then, but that's always been how you get people to care: someone needs to convince them, or you pay them. In a time if turmoil, you can inspire a lot of purpose by giving people a stable job, and then constantly extolling the virtues of the purpose they're working towards.

All that to say, we don't know the future. You are living through the dawn of a new age. Our problems aren't insurmountable, we just don't know how to do it yet. The details are different, but it's not a new circumstance.
I'm not an advocate for apathy, but... If it does go wrong, what actually happens? America collapses, war, people die, and turmoil. We can't know the timeline, and we have 3/4 of those now with the remaining being pretty intangible. The fall of the Roman empire, depending on which fall you're looking at, took 300 to a 1000 years. To the people living through the fall, it wasn't even visible. The final fall ushered in the Renaissance, both a period of great development, but also pessimism born out of the proceeding centuries of turmoil (European peace shattered by 200 years of war, famine, several plagues, and an ice age). Injecting masses of fleeing scholars from Constantinople into that propelled things to new heights as their knowledge from the fallen empire blended with the local knowledge.
We don't know if the empire is falling, how long it's going to take, if we're at the beginning or the end, or if we're even in the empire. We don't know if the collapse will trigger a dark age (not actually dark, just "not roman"), or a golden age as waves of American scientists, artists, writers, mathematicians and engineers take their work to China and unintentionally create a fresh blend of perspectives and shared knowledge that builds on both. (Stereotypes aside we have a lot of those).

People problems are ultimately solvable by people, inevitably by talking.
History consistently tells us that it's weird, messy, and long. Live life, be kind. If someone says to do something for other people for moral reasons, it's a coin toss if they're doing something history will look kindly upon. If someone says to do something for group identity, they're probably fine. If they say to do something to someone else for group identity, they're most likely not. If someone is saying something you've heard before but a lot of people are listening and the people in power don't like it, thiniare probably shifting. Maybe not for the people speaking, but shifting.

It's late and I'm rambling as I fall asleep. When I say "you don't", I mean that history and society are too much to bend in a deliberate way. Best you can do is the right thing at the time as best you can and not worry too much about your role in the big picture. So few people have a role that sets them at the bend of those forces.

Also, I'm not too worried about LLMs and social media, fundamentally. People have been saying and believing bizarre shit forever, they just made it easier and faster. The fading lustre of the Internet is just a drift back a bit towards before it, when people just believed stuff and then no one ever corrected them.

This was my first hold up. I think the correct answer is to print the test onto a substrate that can be molded into a sphere. Then you can draw a geodesic around the number.

Every single candidate should be made to pass a basic grade 8 biology exam.

The machine produces a physical paper record you can read, it doesn't matter what software it's running if you can verify your vote is accurate.

Even if you assumed the test successfully filtered out an educated voterbase, it would take all but five seconds for X party to cheat their exams, kind of like the "grandfather law" which essentially bypassed jim crow era literacy tests for everyone who was white.

I certainly trust The Party That's In Charge At Any Given Time to subjectively come up with the criteria that objectively determines a voter's ignorance level

I can help! So the first step is to be white, and then the second step is to do whatever you think seems right

Idunno I thought the burning coal one was kinda funny